Fabricated citations
““See Henderson et al., 2019, J. of Neuro. Sci., DOI 10.1234/jns.5567.””
Truth: That paper, DOI and authors don't exist.
ThetaWave vs ChatGPT
ChatGPT generates notes from memory. ThetaWave extracts them from your actual lectures, PDFs and recordings — with ~30% higher accuracy and zero hallucinations.
Proven performance
Higher note accuracy
Measured against generative baselines on medical, legal and STEM lectures.
ThetaWave · 95%
ChatGPT · baseline
Same lecture. Same exam. Very different output.
Free plan · Pro from $0.33/day (annual)
Free · Plus $20/mo
Why students switch
Every example below is a real failure mode students hit on academic prompts.
““See Henderson et al., 2019, J. of Neuro. Sci., DOI 10.1234/jns.5567.””
Truth: That paper, DOI and authors don't exist.
““71% of Earth's surface is ocean… approximately 79%.””
Truth: Lecture said 71%. ChatGPT rephrased and the figure shifted.
“Detailed summary of chapters 1–4, then forgets chapter 7 ever existed.”
Truth: Context window cut off your 120-page reading.
Migration
No learning curve. Bring your stuff. Get a verified study kit.
Copy the conversation or download it as PDF — keep anything worth bringing over.
Add lecture recordings, slides, PDFs or a YouTube link. ThetaWave handles the rest.
Get source-grounded notes, flashcards and quizzes in one click.
FAQ